Vegetarian Discussion: Gooberdoodle's Belief In Pre-Existence

Gooberdoodle's Belief In Pre-Existence
Posts: 49

Report Abuse

Use this form to report abuse or request takedown.
The requests are usually processed within 48 hours.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5   Next  (First | Last)

Mr.Smartypants
2013-05-07 14:35:13 EST
"Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo

D*@.
2013-05-08 13:10:52 EST
On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghole-jonnie@lycos.com> wrote:

>"Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo

Goo also apparently believes "they" can suffer a loss:
_________________________________________________________
dh wrote:
>I consider it to be a gain for animals to experience life,

Goo replied:
Aha! So, if they *don't* get to experience life, it necessarily must be a loss!
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

George Plimpton
2013-05-08 13:16:24 EST
On 5/8/2013 10:10 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:

> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
> <bunghole-jonnie@lycos.com> wrote:
>
>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""

That's correct. It's what *you* believe, *Goo*:

The animals that will be raised for us to eat
are more than just "nothing", because they
*will* be born unless something stops their
lives from happening. Since that is the case,
if something stops their lives from happening,
whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying"
them of the life they otherwise would have had.
Goo/Fuckwit - 12/09/1999


Too funny!


Mr.Smartypants
2013-05-09 02:44:27 EST
On May 8, 11:10 am, dh@. wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>
> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
> >"Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo
>
>     Goo also apparently believes "they" can suffer a loss:
> _________________________________________________________
>
> dh wrote:
> >I consider it to be a gain for animals to experience life,
>
> Goo replied:
> Aha!  So, if they *don't* get to experience life, it necessarily must be a loss!
> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯


In spite of himselves Goobs does believe in pre-existence. He's proven
it dozens of times.

Dutch
2013-05-09 03:10:45 EST
Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> On May 8, 11:10 am, dh@. wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>
>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo
>>
>> Goo also apparently believes "they" can suffer a loss:
>> _________________________________________________________
>>
>> dh wrote:
>>> I consider it to be a gain for animals to experience life,
>>
>> Goo replied:
>> Aha! So, if they *don't* get to experience life, it necessarily must be a loss!
>> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>
>
> In spite of himselves Goobs does believe in pre-existence. He's proven
> it dozens of times.
>

Do you always believe nonsense for which there's no evidence, or is this
an exception? Or are you just pursuing a career as an ankle-biter?


D*@.
2013-05-09 18:31:18 EST
On Wed, 08 May 2013 10:16:24 -0700, Goo was amused by his own stupidity:

>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>> <bunghole-jonnie@lycos.com> quoted Goo:
>>
>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>
>That's correct. Too funny!

LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to begin with Goob. It's even more
funny that you can't even attempt to explain your stupid claim, Goo.

D*@.
2013-05-09 18:39:32 EST
On Thu, 09 May 2013 00:10:45 -0700, Dutch <no@email.com> wrote:

>Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>> On May 8, 11:10 am, dh@. wrote:
>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>
>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo
>>>
>>> Goo also apparently believes "they" can suffer a loss:
>>> _________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> dh wrote:
>>>> I consider it to be a gain for animals to experience life,
>>>
>>> Goo replied:
>>> Aha! So, if they *don't* get to experience life, it necessarily must be a loss!
>>> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>>
>>
>> In spite of himselves Goobs does believe in pre-existence. He's proven
>> it dozens of times.
>>
>
>Do you always believe nonsense for which there's no evidence, or is this
>an exception? Or are you just pursuing a career as an ankle-biter?

Goo wants people to believe that something about pre-existence is preventing
it from being to their advantage that they're still alive and so so you, though
neither of you or brother "Derek" are able to explain HOW. I challenge you to
try explaining it now. You will fail to.

George Plimpton
2013-05-09 22:32:32 EST
On 5/9/2013 3:39 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate
cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing
but wasting time ever since, lied:

> On Thu, 09 May 2013 00:10:45 -0700, Dutch <no@email.com> wrote:
>
>> ankle-biter fuckstain lied:
>>> On May 8, 11:10 am, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), ankle-biter fuckstain lied:
>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>> In spite of himselves
>>>
>>
>> Do you always believe nonsense for which there's no evidence, or is this
>> an exception? Or are you just pursuing a career as an ankle-biter?
>
> Prof. Plimpton wants people to believe that something about pre-existence is preventing

You are the one who believes in "pre-existence", *Goo*.


George Plimpton
2013-05-09 22:32:34 EST
On 5/9/2013 3:31 PM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid, illiterate
cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and doing nothing
but wasting time ever since, lied:

> On 5/8/2013 10:16 AM, George Plimpton wrote:
>> On 5/8/2013 10:10 AM, Fuckwit David Harrison - *Goo* - stupid,
>> illiterate cracker and convicted felon, defeated entirely in 1999 and
>> doing nothing but wasting time ever since, lied:
>>
>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>> <bunghole-jonnie@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing.""
>>
>> That's correct. It's what *you* believe, *Goo*:
>>
>> The animals that will be raised for us to eat
>> are more than just "nothing", because they
>> *will* be born unless something stops their
>> lives from happening. Since that is the case,
>> if something stops their lives from happening,
>> whatever it is that stops it is truly "denying"
>> them of the life they otherwise would have had.
>> Goo/Fuckwit - 12/09/1999
>>
>>
>> Too funny!
>
> LOL! It's hilarious that you believe that to

It's hilarious, *Goo*, that you believe in "pre-existence", and that all
your "getting to experience life" fuckwittery is based on it.

Too funny.


Dutch
2013-05-09 23:47:30 EST
dh@. wrote:
> On Thu, 09 May 2013 00:10:45 -0700, Dutch <no@email.com> wrote:
>
>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>> On May 8, 11:10 am, dh@. wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 7 May 2013 11:35:13 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants"
>>>>
>>>> <bunghole-jon...@lycos.com> wrote:
>>>>> "Not existing is not equivalent to "being nothing."" - Goo
>>>>
>>>> Goo also apparently believes "they" can suffer a loss:
>>>> _________________________________________________________
>>>>
>>>> dh wrote:
>>>>> I consider it to be a gain for animals to experience life,
>>>>
>>>> Goo replied:
>>>> Aha! So, if they *don't* get to experience life, it necessarily must be a loss!
>>>> ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
>>>
>>>
>>> In spite of himselves Goobs does believe in pre-existence. He's proven
>>> it dozens of times.
>>>
>>
>> Do you always believe nonsense for which there's no evidence, or is this
>> an exception? Or are you just pursuing a career as an ankle-biter?
>
> Goo wants people to believe that something about pre-existence is preventing
> it from being to their advantage that they're still alive and so so you, though
> neither of you or brother "Derek" are able to explain HOW. I challenge you to
> try explaining it now. You will fail to.

Of course I'll fail, I may as well try to explain it to my Yorkshire
Terrier.


Page: 1 2 3 4 5   Next  (First | Last)


2020 - UsenetArchives.com | Contact Us | Privacy | Stats | Site Search
Become our Patron