Vegetarian Discussion: Since Goo First Lied That Animals Don't Benefit...

Since Goo First Lied That Animals Don't Benefit...
Posts: 11

Report Abuse

Use this form to report abuse or request takedown.
The requests are usually processed within 48 hours.

Page:  Previous  1 2   (First | Last)

678.714.5764
2011-04-14 15:16:06 EST
On 4/14/2011 12:15 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> On Apr 14, 12:03 pm, "678.714.5764"<holiday.mar...@buford.ga> wrote:
>> On 4/14/2011 10:40 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 14, 2:22 am, "678.714.5764"<holiday.mar...@buford.ga> wrote:
>>>> On 4/14/2011 12:14 AM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Apr 12, 2:05 pm, "678.714.5764"<holiday.mar...@buford.ga> wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/12/2011 12:35 PM, Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 10, 9:08 pm, "678.714.5764"<holiday.mar...@buford.ga> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 4/10/2011 8:18 PM, dh@. wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>> ...from lives of positive value,
>>
>>>>>>>> Animals benefit from good welfare compared to bad welfare.
>>
>>>>>>>> Animals do *not* benefit from coming into existence compared with never
>>>>>>>> existing.
>>
>>>>>>> What if their pre-existent state
>>
>>>>>> What "pre-existent state"? What the fuck are you babbling about?
>>
>>>>> There could be a pre-existent state
>>
>>>> Prove it.-
>>
>>> Prove there isn't
>>
>> No, it doesn't work like that. You have to prove there is. It is
>> logically invalid to demand that someone prove something doesn't exist,
>> unless he has claimed it doesn't exist.
>>
>> You claimed pre-existence is a reality. Prove it.-
>
>
> You said you WERE BEFORE

*Prove* there is such a state as "pre-existence", Douchebag.

Too funny...
Page:  Previous  1 2   (First | Last)


2020 - UsenetArchives.com | Contact Us | Privacy | Stats | Site Search
Become our Patron