Vegetarian Discussion: Do You Know What Would Happen If You Gave A Bunch Of Bananas To A Bunch Of Monkeys?

Do You Know What Would Happen If You Gave A Bunch Of Bananas To A Bunch Of Monkeys?
Posts: 54

Report Abuse

Use this form to report abuse or request takedown.
The requests are usually processed within 48 hours.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6   Next  (First | Last)

TibetanMonkey, The-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-Shit
2010-04-16 01:22:48 EST
No, I don't know either, but we can make some educated guesses by
looking at their closest cousins --us.

What will happen is that some monkeys will try to eat more bananas --
the lion's share-- while others go hungry. Some call it "human
nature," but I bet monkeys act like that too.

So, say we have 10 bananas for 10 monkeys. Someone will eat 4, another
2, and so on. If they eat 1 banana each, they would be socialist. But
if they don't, they would be Republican.

***

NOTE: I want to clarify something so there's no misunderstanding thatI
support SOCIALISM...

I'm all against RATIONING A BANANA PER MONKEY, so we must live in
abundance and freedom of choice, which is also denied by MONOPOLISTIC
CAPITALISM.

The Banana Revolution is all about FREEDOM!


---------------------------------------------------------

THE WISE TIBETAN MONKEY SAYS

"Monkeys and humans are such funny animals"

http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION

Green Turtle
2010-04-16 06:49:35 EST
"TibetanMonkey, the-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-Shit" <nolionnoproblem@yahoo.com>
wrote in message
news:317a6572-5545-4868-aeaa-f411b5eae282@q15g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> No, I don't know either, but we can make some educated guesses by
> looking at their closest cousins --us.
>
> What will happen is that some monkeys will try to eat more bananas --
> the lion's share-- while others go hungry. Some call it "human
> nature," but I bet monkeys act like that too.

No the problem is as those monkeys and animals can only eat things, where
man is capable of making farms and producing food to feed millions of
people.

>
> So, say we have 10 bananas for 10 monkeys. Someone will eat 4, another
> 2, and so on. If they eat 1 banana each, they would be socialist. But
> if they don't, they would be Republican.

Again this is where you're an screwed up socialist. You like a watermelon
who green on the outside and red on the inside. You have absolutely no clue
how a economy works. You actually think that if I eat a hamburger then
somebody else doesn't have a hamburger to eat?

A conservative would say let's make a farm and have some more cows and
create some hamburgers. You guys always think about the taking away from
people and the consuming part. It's never about getting people to work and
producing wealth.

You can sit around, or you could go out your uncle's farm and find a old
rust bucket of a car sitting in old shed that stood there for 35 years. You
can take that car and put thousands of hours into it and it will restored
into a beautiful working vehicle. You now can drive around town with great
pride with that car. You can probably sell that restored car for a VERY big
chunk of money.

At the end of the day because you have a car, it does not mean that somebody
else is going without a car now does it? It is true that hard work you
created the ca. As always you socialist people always think about the taking
and consuming pat but never about the building and doing part. This is how
to Connie work, where there's making some cows or cars or placing shingles
on someone's rooftop, you're creating wealth and creating more in society
not consuming.

In fact you sound exactly like how Obama the socialist sounds. It's all
about these accolades all kinds of great things about the government going
to do this and that, but they never talk about the actual building and doing
real things.

So when a person puts all the hard labor in creates that car that wasn't
working can now enjoy it. You just see with pride and envy that person has a
nice car. You see that person eating a burger and you see this as a person
consuming a burger to someone else doesn't get one. You have been taught
that if a person has a car then somebody else doesn't have a car, you been
taught that as a person has a burger to eat, somebody else doesn't get a
burger .

A conservative see all of the wonderful things that each person can do and
contribute to society by creating a building things and making the world a
better place. The conservative dozen see him having a car means that
someone else doesn't have a car, the concert of go out and do things to make
more cars in our society, or schools are hospitals or ever what it needs.

The conservative says let's get a farm going and make more food to feed
people. This is all about creating jobs and resources for your community to
make it a better place.

All you see is selfishness and are brimming with pride and and class envy.
You don't want that person to have that nicer car. The sad part is you don't
understand economy that because I have a car or burger isn't the result of
you not going without one, is result of me working and creating things in
society .

The reason why you're so screwed up intellectually here is you only see
things is being taken away from people and want to take away thing from
others. You'll see a school lunch program is a great thing, and I see it as
sheer insanity as working people are paying for other people to eat their
lunch? Whatever the hell happened with a simple concept of a family making
sandwiches for the child before they send 'em off to school? Yet the
socialists think it's a great idea, but to do their great idea to have to
forcibly take money away from everybody else to implement their great ideal.

What on bloody earth is wrong with having a family make lunch for their
children? What you mean we going to forcibly have people pay for those
lunches? A school lunch program is 100% off the rocks insanity.

Yet you socialists have no problem with this and see is some type of act of
charity where it is not. It's forcibly by law and Decree taking money and
food away from working people and giving it to these people to eat.

So it's clear that you don't understand the difference between humans and
monkeys at all, in fact the look of the native populations as they tended to
live like animals and would strip one place of land dry until it could not
support them, then they just simply pack up their little tents and move on
to fresh grounds. If you look in Europe there are farms that are in the
SAME place for 1000+ years and they are perfectly sustainable.

So you can live like some in the native population who behave like animals
or those monkeys where all they do is just take from nature but never figure
out how to cultivate nature in a sustainable fashion and create more food
for people, the socialist are all about taking, but never the creating part.

> ***
>
> NOTE: I want to clarify something so there's no misunderstanding thatI
> support SOCIALISM...

You are socialist, and your product of the screwed up media and educational
system, and you have no clue what it is to be conservative at all, you're
simply a screwed up person.

>
> I'm all against RATIONING A BANANA PER MONKEY, so we must live in
> abundance and freedom of choice, which is also denied by MONOPOLISTIC
> CAPITALISM.

It's not about rationing bananas it's all about you forcibly wanting to take
away bananas and things from OTHER people. A conservative will explain and
teach you how to make MORE bananas and how to help more people.

Why is it you socialist never talk about creating and working part?

You're all about the consuming and taking of the bananas, never growing and
the hard work it takes to grow and bring those bananas to market..


Super Turtle


Peter Franks
2010-04-16 09:30:25 EST
TibetanMonkey, the-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-Shit wrote:
> No, I don't know either, but we can make some educated guesses by
> looking at their closest cousins --us.
>
> What will happen is that some monkeys will try to eat more bananas --
> the lion's share-- while others go hungry. Some call it "human
> nature," but I bet monkeys act like that too.
>
> So, say we have 10 bananas for 10 monkeys. Someone will eat 4, another
> 2, and so on. If they eat 1 banana each, they would be socialist. But
> if they don't, they would be Republican.
>
> ***
>
> NOTE: I want to clarify something so there's no misunderstanding thatI
> support SOCIALISM...

Socialism is about compulsion (force) -- the elimination of freedom.

> I'm all against RATIONING A BANANA PER MONKEY, so we must live in
> abundance and freedom of choice, which is also denied by MONOPOLISTIC
> CAPITALISM.
>
> The Banana Revolution is all about FREEDOM!

Well then you had better dump socialism.

TibetanMonkey, The-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-Shit
2010-04-16 09:46:03 EST
On Apr 16, 9:30 am, Peter Franks <n...@none.com> wrote:
> TibetanMonkey, the-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-Shit wrote:
> > No, I don't know either, but we can make some educated guesses by
> > looking at their closest cousins --us.
>
> > What will happen is that some monkeys will try to eat more bananas --
> > the lion's share-- while others go hungry. Some call it "human
> > nature," but I bet monkeys act like that too.
>
> > So, say we have 10 bananas for 10 monkeys. Someone will eat 4, another
> > 2, and so on. If they eat 1 banana each, they would be socialist. But
> > if they don't, they would be Republican.
>
> > ***
>
> > NOTE: I want to clarify something so there's no misunderstanding thatI
> > support SOCIALISM...
>
> Socialism is about compulsion (force) -- the elimination of freedom.
>
> > I'm all against RATIONING A BANANA PER MONKEY, so we must live in
> > abundance and freedom of choice, which is also denied by MONOPOLISTIC
> > CAPITALISM.
>
> > The Banana Revolution is all about FREEDOM!
>
> Well then you had better dump socialism.

I wished I could like the law of the jungle (aka capitalism), but I'm
too frugal and smart for that. I also don't believe in bureaucratic
solutions, so that makes me a bad socialist.

In other words, I'm all for having choices except letting the worst
aspects of capitalism run its course: HOMELESSNESS, SUV'S, LACK OF
ROOM FOR ALTERNATIVE VEHICLES (bicycles & EVs), WAR, GATED
COMMUNITIES, WHOLE MANIPULATION BY POLITICIANS AND RELIGIOUS LIARS,
etc.

JIMMIE
2010-04-16 09:53:35 EST
On Apr 16, 1:22 am, "TibetanMonkey, the-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-Shit"
<*.@yahoo.com> wrote:
> No, I don't know either, but we can make some educated guesses by
> looking at their closest cousins --us.
>
> What will happen is that some monkeys will try to eat more bananas --
> the lion's share-- while others go hungry. Some call it "human
> nature," but I bet monkeys act like that too.
>
> So, say we have 10 bananas for 10 monkeys. Someone will eat 4, another
> 2, and so on. If they eat 1 banana each, they would be socialist. But
> if they don't, they would be Republican.
>
> ***
>
> NOTE: I want to clarify something so there's no misunderstanding thatI
> support SOCIALISM...
>
> I'm all against RATIONING A BANANA PER MONKEY, so we must live in
> abundance and freedom of choice, which is also denied by MONOPOLISTIC
> CAPITALISM.
>
> The Banana Revolution is all about FREEDOM!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> THE WISE TIBETAN MONKEY SAYS
>
> "Monkeys and humans are such funny animals"
>
> http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION

Not quite what will happen, First they will destroy most of them while
they are fighting. Maybe one monkey would get a banana and then he
will have to guard the squish mess left on the ground. Also not unlike
us.


Jimmie

TibetanMonkey, The-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-Shit
2010-04-16 10:33:35 EST
On Apr 16, 6:53 am, JIMMIE <jimmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 1:22 am, "TibetanMonkey, the-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-Shit"
>
>
>
> <nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > No, I don't know either, but we can make some educated guesses by
> > looking at their closest cousins --us.
>
> > What will happen is that some monkeys will try to eat more bananas --
> > the lion's share-- while others go hungry. Some call it "human
> > nature," but I bet monkeys act like that too.
>
> > So, say we have 10 bananas for 10 monkeys. Someone will eat 4, another
> > 2, and so on. If they eat 1 banana each, they would be socialist. But
> > if they don't, they would be Republican.
>
> > ***
>
> > NOTE: I want to clarify something so there's no misunderstanding thatI
> > support SOCIALISM...
>
> > I'm all against RATIONING A BANANA PER MONKEY, so we must live in
> > abundance and freedom of choice, which is also denied by MONOPOLISTIC
> > CAPITALISM.
>
> > The Banana Revolution is all about FREEDOM!
>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> > THE WISE TIBETAN MONKEY SAYS
>
> > "Monkeys and humans are such funny animals"
>
> >http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> Not quite what will happen, First they will destroy most of them while
> they are fighting. Maybe one monkey would get a banana and then he
> will have to guard the squish mess left on the ground. Also not unlike
> us.
>
> Jimmie

Maybe we are introducing the problem by giving them all the bananas at
once, and let them to figure it out.

It's like when you give a loan to an African country and some monkey
in government keeps the dough.

TibetanMonkey, The-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-Shit
2010-04-16 11:24:24 EST
On Apr 16, 7:05 am, "TibetanMonkey, Originator of the Banana Kung-Fu"
<*.@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Apr 16, 9:05 am, DanP <dan.pe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 15 Apr, 06:35, "TibetanMonkey, the-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-Shit"
>
> > <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > No, I don't know either, but we can make some educated guesses by
> > > looking at their closest cousins --us.
>
> > > What will happen is that some monkeys will try to eat morebananas--
> > > the lion's share-- while others go hungry. Some call it "human
> > > nature," but I bet monkeys act like that too.
>
> > > So, say we have 10bananasfor 10 monkeys. Someone will eat 4, another
> > > 2, and so on. If they eat 1 banana each, they would be socialist. But
> > > if they don't, they would be Republican.
>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> > > THE WISE TIBETAN MONKEY SAYS
>
> > > "Monkeys and humans are such funny animals"
>
> > >http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> > At the moment I am having 3bananasa day. If you promise me 4 I will
> > join your revolution.
>
> > The only good revolution was the industrial revolution.
>
> > DanP
>
> Besides a steady supply of bananas, I can promise to liberate you from
> the cage (vehicle, home, gated community) and give you room for your
> bikes and alternative vehicles.
>
> I don't think there's a need to get all defensive about it when we can
> set up something like... Key West. Have you been there?

One of the great proposals of the revolution (the Banana Revolution)
is to allow people to ride bike with flip flops (Key West style if you
will) peacefully taking the lane, and having the cars pass on the
other lanes, so the blissful state of mind of the rider is not
disturbed. Yes, you may take some drink in the bottle cage, and it's
not DUI.

That's what I call freedom.


TibetanMonkey, The-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-Shit
2010-04-16 14:01:06 EST
On Apr 16, 9:44 am, Brent <tetraethylleadREMOVET...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On 2010-04-16, Phlip <phlip2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 16, 6:57 am, "TibetanMonkey, the-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-Shit"
> ><comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > Uh, actually, if u are referring to great apes, they would start
> >> > trading bananas for sex.
>
> >> That's true. Actually all those displays of power among us (SUVs,
> >> motorboats, money to burn) are also used to mate with the most
> >> desirable females around.
>
> > And the problem with that would be..?
>
> Nothing if the desire of the human race is to be a bunch of (savage)
> tool using apes.

We have come a long way, from tools to survive to tools to control and
destroy.

>From this...

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_1zLNV2F_hRE/ST2odgjaihI/AAAAAAAABN0/mGDd_-FEozs/s400/the_dawn_of_man_2001_a_space_odyssey-400-400.jpg

To this...

http://www.marketingshift.com/images/internationalSUV-7300cxt.gif


TibetanMonkey, The-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-Shit
2010-04-16 14:54:39 EST
Now we may go into phase II of the experiments in which we will
further tease the monkeys into conflict.

Now some monkeys get bananas and some peanuts. A clear caste emerges
in which the privileged monkeys get bananas and other exquisite
fruits, protecting them from the worse of the jungle, while the ones
getting the peanuts must compete with each other for peanuts and other
symbols of status created by the better monkeys.

That would be quite a mind tease, wouldn't it?


Fred C. Dobbs
2010-04-16 15:15:32 EST
On 4/16/2010 6:30 AM, Peter Franks wrote:
> TibetanMonkey, the-Monkey-with-the-Bag-of-Shit wrote:
>> No, I don't know either, but we can make some educated guesses by
>> looking at their closest cousins --us.
>>
>> What will happen is that some monkeys will try to eat more bananas --
>> the lion's share-- while others go hungry. Some call it "human
>> nature," but I bet monkeys act like that too.
>>
>> So, say we have 10 bananas for 10 monkeys. Someone will eat 4, another
>> 2, and so on. If they eat 1 banana each, they would be socialist. But
>> if they don't, they would be Republican.
>>
>> ***
>>
>> NOTE: I want to clarify something so there's no misunderstanding thatI
>> support SOCIALISM...
>
> Socialism is about compulsion (force) -- the elimination of freedom.

So are lots of other political/economic systems.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6   Next  (First | Last)


2020 - UsenetArchives.com | Contact Us | Privacy | Stats | Site Search
Become our Patron